Chairman Tauzin

Prepared Witness Testimony

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce

W.J. "Billy" Tauzin, Chairman

Link to Committee Tip Line:  Fight Waste, Fraud and Abuse
   

 

 

National Institutes of Health: Decoding our Federal Investment in Genomic Research

Subcommittee on Health
May 22, 2003
10:00 AM
2123 Rayburn House Office Building 

 

 
 

Aristides Patrinos PhD
Director, Office of Biological & Environmental Research
Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC, 20585

Highlights of the testimony by Aristides Patrinos

1. DOE made many important contributions to biological research since the early days of the Atomic Energy Commission, including the field of nuclear medicine.

2. NIH and DOE joined forces in launching the Human Genome Project (HGP) in 1990. Since then our two agencies have worked closely in managing this seminal research endeavor. The partnership has been a model of interagency collaboration with each agency contributing its unique strengths and capabilities and creating a whole greater than the sum of the parts.

3. NIH and DOE, with a strong international involvement, completed the HGP just last month more than two years ahead of schedule and several hundreds of million dollars under the initially estimated budget.

4. The HGP inspired a paradigm shift in biological research from a pure hypothesis-driven "small science" approach to more of a resource-driven approach. The HGP also highlighted the importance of interdisciplinary research, including the physical sciences, automation engineering, and computational science.

5. Modern biological research, including genomics and the study of proteins, rely on research tools developed by the physical sciences, such as the synchrotron radiation sources and nuclear magnetic resonance systems for protein crystallography.

6. The DOE Office of Science builds and operates many of the scientific user facilities (such as the X-ray sources) that are increasingly being used by life scientists in their research. This symbiotic NIH-DOE relationship is expected to continue and even grow.

7. The DOE follow up to the HGP is the Genomes to Life (GTL) program. GTL was developed over the last three years by the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee of the DOE Office of Science with significant input by the broad scientific community.

8. GTL adopts a "systems biology" approach to the study of microbes and microbial communities. GTL does not include any research on human biology.

9. GTL is a basic research effort that is aimed at long-term solutions to several DOE problems. These include the bioremediation of mixed waste at many of DOE contaminated sites; the enhanced sequestration of carbon by the terrestrial and marine biosphere in order to reduce the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases and; the development of clean energy sources such as hydrogen.

10. GTL will marry the tools of modern molecular biology with advanced scientific computers to provide highly accurate simulations of microbial systems and their interactions with the environment.

11. GTL proposes to build four scientific user facilities to enable its high-throughput research activities, including the production of proteins and protein tags as well as advanced systems for the intracellular imaging of microbes.

12. We expect continuing close collaborations with NIH on GTL and other programs. GTL will involve scientists from the academic community, our national laboratories and private institutions such as Craig Venter's Institute for Biological Energy Alternatives.

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:

I am pleased to testify before the Subcommittee about the future of genomic research at DOE. I am also prepared to discuss the Genomes to Life program and our interactions with the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

DOE is proud of the contributions we have made to biological research since the early days of the Atomic Energy Commission and of the role we have played in the Human Genome Project (HGP). The NIH and DOE joined forces in 1990 to launch the HGP and we have worked closely over the years to reach the successful completion of the project last month almost two years ahead of schedule and several hundred million dollars under the original estimate of $3 billion. The partnership with the NIH in the HGP has been a model of interagency cooperation with each agency contributing its unique culture and strengths to create a whole that was truly greater than the sum of the parts. The DOE brought to the HGP its strengths in the managerial arena: an impressive network of national laboratories, each with its own area of scientific expertise. DOE leaders' experience in managing large-scale projects (mostly in the physical sciences) provided critical input to the HGP, starting during the formative years and continuing through today.

With the successful completion of the HGP we are entering an exciting new era of biological research greatly enhanced by the modern tools of molecular biology that have been enabled by genomics. This new era of biological research offers the promise of revolutionary solutions to challenges we face across a remarkable spectrum - from agriculture to carbon sequestration to clean affordable energy to the environment to industrial processes to medicine to national security to name but a few. While technologies and research tools will be developed and shared across disciplines, Federal agencies, academia, industry, and international borders, as they were in the Human Genome Project, the specific research challenges and needs will not be shared.

Strategies that NIH will use for understanding disease processes and for developing improved diagnostics and cures will differ greatly from those needed to develop new ways to sequester excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, produce abundant and affordable supplies of clean energy, and clean up contaminated waste sites. Although completion of the HGP will thus lead to somewhat divergent research paths, NIH and DOE will continue to coordinate research efforts and explore opportunities for collaboration and cooperation. Such opportunities will emerge from both the many NIH-DOE ties as well as through the interagency forums led by the Office of Science and Technology Policy in the Executive Office of the President.

DOE's entry into this new era is the Genomes to Life (GTL) program that has been developed with broad scientific community input and led by the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC). The focus of the GTL program is on microbes and microbial communities and seeks to harness their properties and capabilities to address DOE needs in environmental bioremediation, carbon sequestration, and clean energy production such as generating hydrogen.

The research approaches and tools that DOE needs to understand microbes so well that we can use them to help solve DOE challenges will, in many cases, be very different than those used by NIH to study disease-causing microbes. DOE needs to understand the nature and biochemical capabilities of microbes in the oceans and in subsurface environments - sites and microbes not likely to be of significant interest to NIH - since the microbes in those environments are the ones that we need to put to work to help us solve energy and environmental challenges. In addition, most of the microbes that DOE needs to understand, live and "work" as parts of complex communities made up of hundreds or thousands of different microbes - a scientific challenge very different from the challenges faced by NIH's need to understand disease-causing microbes.

We believe that many of the scientific discoveries in this new century will happen at the interfaces of scientific disciplines, including the interfaces between biology and the physical and computational sciences. Modern biological research will increasingly rely on the scientific tools that are developed by the physical sciences. One example is the determination of the structure of biological molecules using the synchrotron radiation sources, neutron sources and nuclear magnetic resonance facilities. Most of these facilities are built and operated by DOE and the number of their users from the life sciences has grown from a few percentage points to approximately forty percent in just the last ten years. Another example is advanced simulation of cellular processes using high performance supercomputers. The new generation of medical imagers will also require significant computational resources for the processing of vast amounts of data.

We envision many significant opportunities for future collaborations between NIH and DOE as scientific research becomes more interdisciplinary and more reliant on cutting-edge scientific tools. Many of these tools will be developed by the DOE research programs for DOE applications and some of these tools will be considered by NIH for applications to human biological research and for medical applications. We expect to continue our regular and productive dialog with our NIH colleagues to identify such opportunities for collaboration and to help make them happen.

Despite its microbial focus the GTL program will enable many collaborations with our NIH colleagues, including those from the National Human Genome Research Institute, the National Institute for General Medical Sciences, and the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Discoveries that may serve the DOE missions in bioremediation, carbon sequestration, and clean energy production may prove relevant to applications in human health and medicine. Similarly, insights derived form the study of human biology may help us properly tweak microbial systems to serve DOE needs.

Many have called this new century the "century of biology" because of its promise in providing new solutions to many of humanity's problems. At DOE we plan to exploit these new biological advances for the benefit of the Nation and we expect that our productive research partnership with the NIH will continue and even expand.

I would be pleased to answer your questions.

 
 

Related Documents

 

 
 

Printer Friendly

Comment On This Page

Related Documents

 
 

Document Menu

Hearing Webcast

Invited Witnesses

Member Statements

Printed Hearing Record
(transcript)